Termination w.r.t. Q proof of TRS/TRCSREx6_Luc98

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,13] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(from(X)) → FROM(proper(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → FROM(s(X))
FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → FIRST(X, Z)
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → FROM(active(X))
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(X1, active(X2))
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(active(X1), X2)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
S(ok(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → CONS(Y, first(X, Z))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → CONS(X, from(s(X)))
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(proper(X1), proper(X2))
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
FIRST(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → S(active(X))
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
PROPER(from(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
FROM(ok(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(from(X)) → FROM(proper(X))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → FROM(s(X))
FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → FIRST(X, Z)
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → FROM(active(X))
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(X1, active(X2))
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(active(X1), X2)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
S(ok(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → CONS(Y, first(X, Z))
ACTIVE(from(X)) → CONS(X, from(s(X)))
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(proper(X1), proper(X2))
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
FIRST(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → S(active(X))
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
PROPER(from(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
FROM(ok(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted some edges using various graph approximations

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → FROM(s(X))
PROPER(from(X)) → FROM(proper(X))
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → FIRST(X, Z)
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → FROM(active(X))
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(X1, active(X2))
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(active(X1), X2)
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
ACTIVE(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → CONS(Y, first(X, Z))
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
S(ok(X)) → S(X)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → CONS(X, from(s(X)))
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(active(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → FIRST(proper(X1), proper(X2))
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → S(X)
FIRST(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → S(active(X))
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(from(X)) → PROPER(X)
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
FROM(ok(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [13,14,18] contains 7 SCCs with 16 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)
FROM(ok(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

FROM(mark(X)) → FROM(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

FROM(ok(X)) → FROM(X)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
FROM(x1) = FROM(x1)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
ok(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[FROM₁, mark_1]

Status:

mark₁: [1]
FROM₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FROM(ok(X)) → FROM(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

FROM(ok(X)) → FROM(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
FROM(x1) = FROM(x1)
ok(x1) = ok(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[FROM₁, ok_1]

Status:

ok₁: [1]
FROM₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
CONS(x1, x2) = CONS(x1, x2)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
ok(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

mark₁: [1]
CONS₂: [2,1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
CONS(x1, x2) = CONS(x2)
ok(x1) = ok(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

ok₁ > CONS₁

Status:

CONS₁: [1]
ok₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(ok(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1) = S(x1)
ok(x1) = ok(x1)
mark(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[S₁, ok_1]

Status:

ok₁: [1]
S₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1) = S(x1)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[S₁, mark_1]

Status:

mark₁: [1]
S₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

FIRST(X1, mark(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

FIRST(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
FIRST(x1, x2) = FIRST(x2)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
ok(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

mark₁ > FIRST₁

Status:

mark₁: [1]
FIRST₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FIRST(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)
FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

FIRST(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → FIRST(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
FIRST(x1, x2) = FIRST(x2)
ok(x1) = ok(x1)
mark(x1) = mark

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

ok₁ > [FIRST₁, mark]

Status:

FIRST₁: [1]
ok₁: [1]
mark: []

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

FIRST(mark(X1), X2) → FIRST(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
FIRST(x1, x2) = FIRST(x1)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

mark₁ > FIRST₁

Status:

mark₁: [1]
FIRST₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ PisEmptyProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(from(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(first(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(from(X)) → PROPER(X)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PROPER(x1) = PROPER(x1)
s(x1) = x1
from(x1) = x1
cons(x1, x2) = cons(x1, x2)
first(x1, x2) = first(x1, x2)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[PROPER₁, first_2]

Status:

PROPER₁: [1]
first₂: [2,1]
cons₂: [2,1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(from(X)) → PROPER(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

PROPER(from(X)) → PROPER(X)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PROPER(x1) = PROPER(x1)
s(x1) = s(x1)
from(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[PROPER₁, s_1]

Status:

PROPER₁: [1]
s₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(from(X)) → PROPER(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PROPER(from(X)) → PROPER(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PROPER(x1) = PROPER(x1)
from(x1) = from(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[PROPER₁, from_1]

Status:

from₁: [1]
PROPER₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ PisEmptyProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(from(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X2)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(first(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(from(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1) = ACTIVE(x1)
first(x1, x2) = first(x1, x2)
cons(x1, x2) = cons(x1, x2)
from(x1) = x1
s(x1) = s(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[ACTIVE₁, s_1]

Status:

ACTIVE₁: [1]
first₂: [2,1]
s₁: [1]
cons₂: [2,1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(from(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(from(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1) = ACTIVE(x1)
from(x1) = from(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[ACTIVE₁, from_1]

Status:

from₁: [1]
ACTIVE₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
TOP(x1) = x1
ok(x1) = x1
active(x1) = x1
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
proper(x1) = x1
from(x1) = from(x1)
s(x1) = s(x1)
0 = 0
cons(x1, x2) = x1
first(x1, x2) = first(x1, x2)
nil = nil

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

s₁ > [mark₁, from_1]
0 > nil
first₂ > [mark₁, from_1]
first₂ > nil

Status:

from₁: [1]
mark₁: [1]
first₂: [2,1]
s₁: [1]
0: multiset
nil: multiset

The following usable rules [14] were oriented:

from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
TOP(x1) = TOP(x1)
ok(x1) = ok(x1)
active(x1) = x1
from(x1) = from(x1)
s(x1) = s(x1)
mark(x1) = mark
cons(x1, x2) = cons(x2)
first(x1, x2) = first(x1, x2)
0 = 0
nil = nil

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[from₁, cons_1] > [mark, first_2] > [TOP₁, ok₁, s_1]
[from₁, cons_1] > [mark, first_2] > nil
0 > nil

Status:

from₁: [1]
first₂: [1,2]
s₁: [1]
0: multiset
TOP₁: [1]
ok₁: [1]
cons₁: [1]
nil: multiset
mark: []

The following usable rules [14] were oriented:

from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(first(0, X)) → mark(nil)
active(first(s(X), cons(Y, Z))) → mark(cons(Y, first(X, Z)))
active(from(X)) → mark(cons(X, from(s(X))))
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(active(X1), X2)
active(first(X1, X2)) → first(X1, active(X2))
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(from(X)) → from(active(X))
first(mark(X1), X2) → mark(first(X1, X2))
first(X1, mark(X2)) → mark(first(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
from(mark(X)) → mark(from(X))
proper(first(X1, X2)) → first(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(from(X)) → from(proper(X))
first(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(first(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
from(ok(X)) → ok(from(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.